Answered

Original Source MaterialWhile solitary negative reactions or unjustified suggestions for change have the potential to dissipate discourse rather than build it, the pattern analysis shows that the anonymous condition seemed to provide a safe explorative space for learners to try out more reasons for their multiple solutions. Teachers will rarely give anonymous feedback, but the experience of giving anonymous feedback may open a social space where learners can try out the reasons for their suggestions.Student VersionTeachers don't often provide feedback anonymously, but the ability to provide feedback anonymously may create a context where the rationale associated with specific suggestions can be more safely explored (Howard, Barrett, & Frick, 2010). However, we cannot assume that all anonymous online spaces will serve as safe social spaces.Which of the following is true for the Student Version above?

A. Word-for-Word plagiarism
B. Paraphrasing plagiarism
C. This is not plagiarism

Answer :

laurasanchez0906

Answer:

The correct answer is:

B. Paraphrasing plagiarism

Explanation:

The student uses the same kind of words that the original author does in the same order. Therefore, this would be considered as paraphrasing plagiarism. The student must have considered to change the order of the text, so it did not look as similar to the original as it does now in order to avoid this kind of academic problem.

Other Questions