Answer :
Answer:
a) Null hypothesis:[tex]p_{1} = p_{2}[/tex]
Alternative hypothesis:[tex]p_{1} \neq p_{2}[/tex]
b) [tex]z=\frac{p_{1}-p_{2}}{\sqrt{\hat p (1-\hat p)(\frac{1}{n_{1}}+\frac{1}{n_{2}})}}[/tex] (1)
Where [tex]\hat p=\frac{X_{1}+X_{2}}{n_{1}+n_{2}}=\frac{688+671}{989+1012}=0.679[/tex]
c) [tex]z=\frac{0.696-0.663}{\sqrt{0.679(1-0.679)(\frac{1}{989}+\frac{1}{1012})}}=1.58[/tex]
d) For this case we see that [tex]\hat p_1 > \hat p_2[/tex] so then the answer for this cae would men
Step-by-step explanation:
Information given
[tex]X_{1}=688[/tex] represent the number of men with smartphone
[tex]X_{2}=671[/tex] represent the number of women with smartphone
[tex]n_{1}=989[/tex] sample of men selected
[tex]n_{2}=1012[/tex] sample of women selected
[tex]p_{1}=\frac{688}{989}=0.696[/tex] represent the proportion of men with smartphone
[tex]p_{2}=\frac{671}{1012}=0.663[/tex] represent the proportion of women with smartphone
[tex]\hat p[/tex] represent the pooled estimate of p
z would represent the statistic
[tex]p_v[/tex] represent the value
Part a
We want to test if we have difference in the proportion owning a smartphone between men and women, the system of hypothesis would be:
Null hypothesis:[tex]p_{1} = p_{2}[/tex]
Alternative hypothesis:[tex]p_{1} \neq p_{2}[/tex]
Part b
The statistic for this case is given by:
[tex]z=\frac{p_{1}-p_{2}}{\sqrt{\hat p (1-\hat p)(\frac{1}{n_{1}}+\frac{1}{n_{2}})}}[/tex] (1)
Where [tex]\hat p=\frac{X_{1}+X_{2}}{n_{1}+n_{2}}=\frac{688+671}{989+1012}=0.679[/tex]
Part c
Replacing the info given we got:
[tex]z=\frac{0.696-0.663}{\sqrt{0.679(1-0.679)(\frac{1}{989}+\frac{1}{1012})}}=1.58[/tex]
Part d
For this case we see that [tex]\hat p_1 > \hat p_2[/tex] so then the answer for this cae would men