Answer :
The two ways that opposes that the Bill of rights opposes the idea of divine right of kings are:
- it established that religion had no relevance to the monarch's role
- and it stated that the monarch's power was subject to limits set by Parliament.
These ideas are the reason why there is a great difference between the Bill of rights and the rights of kings.
Two ways the Bill of Rights opposes the idea of the divine right of kings
(1) by establishing that the monarch's function is not influenced by religious beliefs, and
(2) by stating that the monarch's authority is limited by statutes passed by Parliament. It is because of these concepts that the Bill of Rights stands in stark contrast to the rights of monarchs.
This is further explained below.
What is Bill of Rights?
Generally, The English constitutional agreement of 1689 established the tenets of parliamentary supremacy, guaranteed the Protestant succession, and confirmed the removal of James II and the accession of William and Mary.
In conclusion,The Bill of Rights rejects the concept of divine right of monarchs in two ways: (1) by establishing that the monarch's function is not influenced by religious beliefs, and (2) by stating that the monarch's authority is limited by statutes passed by Parliament. It is because of these concepts that the Bill of Rights stands in stark contrast to the rights of monarchs.
Read more about Bill of Rights
https://brainly.com/question/16237105
#SPJ5