Dcha2490
Answered

6.06 war on the bank-

Step 1 -
Summarize the details of McCulloch v. Maryland and Gibbons v. Ogden from Jackson’s perspective.

Step 2 -
Select three of the following aspects and influences of Jackson’s presidency:
Nullification Crisis
National Bank veto
Maysville Road veto
political participation
constitutional government
Specie Circular

Step Three -
Your profile must
include five status updates describing Jackson’s perspective on the court cases and/or selected aspects of his presidency
each status update should be at least three complete sentences
include two images as visual representations for the status updates (images should relate to the court cases and/or selected aspects of his presidency)
include a one-sentence caption for each image.

Answer :

orozcomao13

Answer:

step 1 Andrew Jackson opposed the establishment of a national, federal bank and he would have opposed the McCulloch v. Maryland decision. ... Jackson would also have opposed the ruling in Gibbons v. Ogden, which he would have said expanded the Congress's power to cover interstate commerce to also include commercial navigation.

step 2 Constitutional Government

Maysville Road Veto

National Bank Veto

step 3 Jackson's presidency started in 1829, and forged democratic practice in the United States. His mandate was defined as "The era of the common man." It eliminated the need to present personal skills to be able to access the vote - even when African Americans, natives and women had to wait for their exercise. Prison sentences for debts were abolished and public schools were created under his mandate.

Historiography treasures moments of his mandate of supreme brilliance:

▪ He developed a war against the Bank of the United States. At that time, the Federal government partially owned the bank by owning the monopoly of federal deposits. Jackson ordered, in 1833, the Secretary of the Treasury, to withdraw them to destroy the financial institution, considering it a great victory for the country's economic democracy.

▪ During his term the tariff conflict developed. It was created when Congress passed a law that increased them, emphasizing cotton and glass. Its objective was to promote the development of manufactures. The citizens of South Carolina came to threaten to separate from the United States. The dispute was resolved, but anticipated tensions between Northerners and Southerners: one of the causes of the Civil War (1861-1865).

Among the gray pages of his mandate is the displacement of Native Americans from their lands. The Congress approved in 1830 the "Indian Removal Act", conferring on the president power to make treaties guaranteeing his transfer to the new territories in the Great Plains. However, in praxis they were victims of the use of force by stripping them of their lands. Jackson stressed that he ended the indigenous problem in the United States, but only moved the conflict west of the Mississsippi River. there

Answer:

Status Update 1

Insert McCulloch v. Maryland update text here.

-After the War of 1812, the U.S. government needed to borrow money to pay off war debts. At this time in history, each state had its own bank. This meant that the U.S. government had to work with multiple state banks to borrow money. To solve this problem, in 1816 Congress decided to set up the Second Bank of the United States with branches in multiple states. Many of the states opposed the national bank because it meant that their state banks had to compete with the national bank for business. Many states were unhappy with the Second Bank of the United States. One of those states was Maryland. To show its unhappiness, Maryland passed a law that required the national bank to pay a heavy tax to the state of Maryland. This was a move to destroy the Baltimore branch of the Second Bank of the United States. James McCulloch, cashier of the Baltimore branch, had to pay a $15,000 annual tax. When McCulloch refused to pay the tax, a Maryland court convicted him and fined him $2,500. He appealed the decision to the Maryland Court of Appeals and lost again. The dispute then ended up in the Supreme Court of the United States, with Chief Justice John Marshall presiding.

Status Update 2

Insert Gibbons v. Ogden update text here.

-Many states in the early 1800s passed laws to protect businesses within their borders. New York gave two men the exclusive right of steamboat navigation on the state’s waters. One of the men was Robert Fulton, who invented the steamboat Clermont. Aaron Ogden had a special license from the men to use steamboats on the state’s waters. Ogden requested that a local court stop Thomas Gibbons from running his boats, which competed with Ogden’s. The court agreed and issued Gibbons an injunction to stop using his boats in New York. Gibbons appealed the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court. He had permission from Congress to use his steamboats between New Jersey and New York waters. Business that involves more than one state is interstate trade. Congress regulated interstate commerce under the U.S. Constitution. Chief Justice John Marshall presided over the case.

Explanation:

i'll update my answer when i have update 3

Other Questions